ABSTRACT
Importance Establishing a universal metric for nutrition security, defined as, “consistent and equitable access to healthy, safe, affordable foods essential to optimal health and well-being,” is a national priority. Understanding how the Healthy Eating Index-2020 (HEI-2020) could be used to measure and monitor nutrition security in the population can assist in surveillance and improve the design of nutrition programs and policies.
Objective To examine the utility of the HEI-2020 as an evidence-based measure of nutrition security.
Design This serial cross-sectional study used data from the 2009-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES).
Setting Nationally representative, population-based survey
Participants Data for N=22,168 US adults (≥20 years) were analyzed.
Main outcome We derived HEI-2020 scores (0-100), commonly used to capture overall diet quality, from participants’ two 24-hour dietary recalls. Nutrition security categories were established: high nutrition security (>70-100), marginal (>60-70), low (>50-60), and very low (0-50).
Results Only 13% of US adults had high nutrition security while nearly two-thirds had low or very low nutrition security. Nutrition security was higher for adults who were older, female, “Other” race or ethnicity, born outside of the US, have higher education attainment, higher income, and food security. Compared to adults with high nutrition security, adults with very low nutrition security had the lowest intakes of unprocessed or minimally processed foods, fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and seafood and the highest intakes of ultra-processed foods, refined grains, and red and processed meats (all P-trends <0.01). Similarly, adults with very low nutrition security were more likely to have elevated adiposity, lower HDL cholesterol, higher triglycerides, higher fasting glucose, and higher hemoglobin A1c (all P-trends ≤0.01).
Conclusions The HEI is a robust measure of nutrition security that can be directly linked to the construct of nutrition security. Using evidence-based HEI cut-points as nutrition security categories would allow policy makers, public health practitioners and nutrition professionals to set benchmarks and nationwide targets for achieving nutrition security.
KEY POINTS
Question Can the Healthy Eating Index (HEI)-2020 be used as an evidence-based measure of nutrition security?
Findings Using nationally representative data, we created four categories of nutrition security using HEI-2020 scores: high (≥70), marginal (>60-70, low (>50-60), and very low (≤50). Less than 1 in 6 US adults had high nutrition security. High nutrition security was less prevalent among adults with greater socioeconomic disadvantage. High nutrition security was also associated with more favorable cardiometabolic risk profiles.
Meaning The HEI can be directly linked to categories of nutrition security and used for national program and policy setting.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Source data is publically available and can be found here: https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Conflicts of interest: None
Financial disclosures: None
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
