Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Designing a Perioperative Mind-Body Intervention for Peripheral Vascular Interventions

C. Y. Maximilian, Darshan Mehta, Anahita Dua, Antonia Stephen, Alex M. Bruce, Aynsley Forsythe, Hovig V. Chitilian, Erik J. Bringle, James C. Simpson, Katherine M. Parady, Lisa A. McNeil, Margaret A. Baim, Matthew J. Eagleton, David C. Chang, Gloria Y. Yeh
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.07.24308071
C. Y. Maximilian
1Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston MA
Png MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: cympng{at}gmail.com
Darshan Mehta
2Benson-Henry Institute for Mind Body Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
7Osher Center for Integrative Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anahita Dua
1Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston MA
MD, MBA, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Antonia Stephen
3Division of Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alex M. Bruce
4Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
RT
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aynsley Forsythe
4Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
RN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hovig V. Chitilian
5Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erik J. Bringle
4Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
RN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James C. Simpson
5Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katherine M. Parady
4Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
RN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lisa A. McNeil
4Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
RN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Margaret A. Baim
2Benson-Henry Institute for Mind Body Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
MS ANP-BC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew J. Eagleton
1Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston MA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David C. Chang
6Codman Center for Clinical Effectiveness in Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
MPH PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gloria Y. Yeh
7Osher Center for Integrative Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
8Division of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) performed under procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) can be associated with anxiety and poor compliance with patient instructions during surgery. Mind-body interventions (MBIs) such as meditation have demonstrated the potential to decrease perioperative anxiety, though this area is understudied, and no tailored interventions have been developed for the vascular surgical patient population.

Objectives We aimed to design a perioperative MBI that specifically targeted vascular surgical patients undergoing PVIs under PSA. We sought to perform this in a scientifically rigorous, multi-disciplinary collaborative manner.

Methods Following the Obesity-Related Behavioral Intervention Trials (ORBIT) model, we designed (Phase 1a) and then refined (Phase 1b) a MBI for patients undergoing PVIs under PSA to decrease perioperative anxiety and sedation and facilitate patient intraoperative compliance. Phase 1a involved a literature review, informal information gathering and synthesis, and drafting a preliminary protocol for a perioperative MBI. Phase 1b involved assembling a multi-disciplinary expert panel of perioperative and mind-body clinicians and researchers to improve the MBI using an iterative, modified Delphi approach.

Results The modified Delphi process was completed, and a consensus was reached after three iterations. The resulting MBI consisted of two seven-minute preoperative guided meditations on the day of surgery, including diaphragmatic breathing, body scans, and guided imagery emphasizing awareness of the ipsilateral leg where the vascular surgery was performed. A document delineating the integration of the MBI into the operating room workflow was produced, including details regarding the intervention’s timing, duration, and modality.

Conclusion Using a multi-specialty expert panel, we designed a novel MBI in the form of a guided meditation with elements of mindfulness and guided imagery to decrease anxiety and increase intraoperative compliance for patients undergoing PVIs under PSA. A prospective pilot study is being planned to test the program’s feasibility.

Introduction

Perioperative anxiety is a state of anxiety that patients often experience before and during their surgical procedure related to anesthesia or surgery, including fears about their medical condition, adverse events, or complications.1,2 This anxiety is extremely common, even in individuals without any prior diagnosis of anxiety disorder, and has been associated with perioperative hemodynamic instability and, correspondingly, worse procedural outcomes.1,3 Perioperative anxiety can be further compounded for patients with an anesthetic plan of procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA, also known as conscious sedation) as opposed to general anesthesia because they remain continuously aware of perioperative activity.4,5 For patients undergoing peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs), PSA is often the preferred standard-of-care, because it avoids the cardiopulmonary stress of intubation, though patients need to be awake enough to comply with essential perioperative instructions from proceduralists such as holding the ipsilateral leg still and breath holds at certain intervals.6 Perioperative anxiety can be especially problematic in those undergoing PVI’s since it can impact patients’ ability to comply with these intra-operative procedural instructions, which can result in repeated imaging attempts and thus increased intravenous contrast administration and radiation exposure to both the patients and the operative room providers. For such patients, the pharmacological balance of anesthesia between patient comfort/anxiety reduction and intraoperative compliance can be challenging, as oversedation can not only result in cardiopulmonary comprise but also involuntary disinhibition, which can prompt intraoperative conversion to general anesthesia or even on-table abortion of the procedure.7

Mind-body interventions (MBIs) have been shown to have anxiolytic and resulting positive effects on hemodynamic parameters in both the inpatient and outpatient settings.8,9 Prior perioperative MBIs have ranged from relaxation techniques and music therapy to hypnosis, with mixed but generally favorable results in terms of postoperative pain, anxiety, and even hemodynamics such as modest decreases in heart rate and diastolic blood pressure.10-17 Additionally, a study comparing pharmacological sedation to pharmacological sedation with adjunctive hypnosis showed that there were potential cost savings even if the group with adjunctive hypnosis consumed more operating room time.18 In a ninety-patient trial of patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery, perioperative cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) was also shown to result in improved pain tolerance and improved postoperative mobility.19 More recently, preoperative meditation has demonstrated encouraging results; three sessions of preoperative pre-prandial Rajyoga meditation in cardiac surgery patients not only resulted in less postoperative anxiety but also significantly decreased serum cortisol levels compared to a control group.20 Other studies in orthopedic surgery have associated similar mind-body interventions with better sleep quality and pain control;21 and several trials are still ongoing.22

Despite this supportive literature, this area remains understudied. There are several notable challenges to implementing such interventions in the perioperative arena, including time constraints, concomitant periprocedural tasks from various operating room teams, the potential for additional staff to be needed, and the need for more high-quality evidence to support such novel interventions.23-25 Furthermore, while prior MBIs trialed perioperatively have shown preliminary promise, to our knowledge, interventions have not been designed for or tailored to a specific surgery. There has yet to be an intervention with content for vascular surgical patients.17 Given the intraoperative instructions for patients undergoing PVIs that are unique to vascular surgery, a guided meditation program focused on breath awareness and body scan techniques could potentially synergize with adequate analgesia and sedation goals.7 As such, we sought to design a novel perioperative MBI with the goal to decrease anxiety and increase intraoperative compliance for patients undergoing PVIs under PSA.

Methods

To develop our intervention, we used the framework from the ORBIT model, which is known as a flexible and progressive approach for the creation of novel behavioral treatments.26 Given the multitude of stakeholders in the perioperative space, we sought to have input from perioperative nurses, radiation technologists, anesthesiologists, surgeons, integrative medicine clinicians, and researchers, and also vascular surgical patients themselves, to design a mind-body intervention using a multi-disciplinary expert panel with both high fidelity and high likelihood of successful integration into the perioperative space. This paper describes the equivalent of Phase Ia (Design) and Phase Ib (Refine) from the ORBIT model to develop our intervention. This process was deemed exempt by the Mass General Brigham Institutional Review Board.

Phase Ia (Design)

We began the design of our protocol with a literature review of prior mind-body interventions and anxiolytic therapies used in the perioperative care of surgical patients. We additionally gathered informal information through contact with thought-leaders in the mind-body clinical and research field (through the personal network of our study team, including but not limited to those within our institutions) to solicit feedback. Leaders included the clinical and research directors and researchers at the Benson-Henry Institute for Mind-Body Medicine at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), the Osher Center for Integrative Health at Harvard Medical School and Brigham & Women’s Hospital, and leaders in the Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction program developed at the University of Massachusetts Medical School. In the context of routine clinical care, the lead investigator (CP) had previously sought informal feedback from ten patients who had previously undergone PVIs regarding their perioperative care and how they felt their experience would have been improved.

With the synthesis of this information and support, we modified a preexisting, publicly available breath awareness and body scan guided meditation script by Jon Kabat-Zinn27 to tailor it to our target patient population. Given that the typical vascular surgical patient undergoing PVIs is of advanced age and comorbid, we were deliberate about using a trauma-informed perspective when editing our script.28 The stated goals of the intervention were to decrease patient anxiety, increase patient compliance with intermittent breath holds, and keep the procedure extremity still.

This early script and the preliminarily proposed logistics of the intervention were presented during two group meetings, each with perioperative staff, including vascular anesthesiologists and nurses, to solicit verbal feedback. Logistical considerations of the MBI included the timing (specifically how to chronologically integrate it into the typical perioperative workflow), duration (the length of the recording(s)). and location (the pre-operative holding area versus in transit to the operating room versus in the operating room). Based on this initial feedback received and with input from the senior study investigators with mind-body research expertise, a proposed protocol for our PVI-specific guided meditation program was developed.

Phase Ib (Refine)

Expert panel: Formal recruitment for our expert panel was performed through the leadership of the respective departments of integrative medicine, surgery, and anesthesia at MGH to have appropriate representation amongst healthcare providers who care for vascular surgical patients in the perioperative sphere at MGH. We first began via open feedback from the core investigator team (CP, DM, GY) to develop a detailed protocol, which included basic tenets of when, where, and how the meditation program would be implemented in the context of the perioperative encounter. Next, as described below, the input of the larger expert panel was solicited and iteratively incorporated into the design of the proposed MBI. While the program’s stated objectives were to decrease patient anxiety perioperatively and increase patient compliance with on-table instruction intraoperatively, it was emphasized that this intervention should minimize disruption to the existing operating room workflow and avoid adding additional work for the perioperative staff.

We employed a modified Delphi process for the Expert Panel according to the following iterative steps:

  1. Documents containing background research, objectives, and the preliminary protocol and preliminary meditation script were distributed to the panel, with highlighted changes from the prior iteration of the program.

  2. The panel members reviewed the documents. Then, they provided their assessment of the current version of the intervention via RedCap survey, a secure web-based application that allowed reporting and collating of responses directly to the lead investigator while remaining anonymous to the rest of the panel. This assessment had two parts: numerical ratings on a Likert scale (Figure 1, where 1 corresponded to Strongly Agree and 5 corresponded to Strongly Disagree) and the second was open-ended feedback regarding program elements being debated. These question categories included assessments of potential implications for current perioperative workflow and the potential benefits (to both the patients and healthcare providers) of the proposed intervention.

  3. Based on such responses, the lead investigator interviewed individual panel members individually for further elaboration and clarification.

  4. The feedback (from steps 2 and 3) was then summarized in a Word document, which included descriptive statistics of the numerical ratings.

  5. The core investigator team then convened to review the documents and make appropriate modifications to the program.

  6. This cycle was repeated until the expert panel achieved consensus (pre-determined to be a mean score of less than 1.5.

Results

Phase 1a (Design)

Content of the meditation audio script

Informed by our preexisting clinical knowledge and experience and the informal feedback from our clinical PVI patients, the preexisting guided meditation script was preliminarily modified. Patients mentioned the sensations of pain and cramping most noticeable during obtaining femoral arterial access, but also during balloon angioplasty, and discomfort throughout the procedure when they were asked to keep their ipsilateral leg in the same position for a prolonged period. Based on the synthesis of this information and our literature search, the script was modified to focus on the body scan of the ipsilateral leg (of the procedure) and mindful breath awareness. A focused body scan of the groin area was initially included due to the potential benefit of increased awareness of the site planned for vascular access. After investigator discussion in the context of best trauma-informed perspectives, this component was removed and deemed too emotionally sensitive an area to target. The script was further refined with appropriate language to contextualize the program script as an adaptation of the original and to state the aim of the study to improve perioperative clinical outcomes. We also received recommendations for the voice pacing indicators for the audio recording.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Implementation in the perioperative setting

During our meetings with our perioperative colleagues, there were two critical points of deliberation. First was the location of the guided meditation MBI. An advantage of performing the MBI in the preoperative holding area would be more available time, logistically easier implementation, and more flexibility with timing. An advantage to performing the MBI in the operating room is the potential for more durable and temporal benefits of guided meditation due to the decreased lead-in time to the surgical procedure. Having at least a component of the MBI in the preoperative area would take advantage of unused “buffer time” between procedures when the patient is left waiting. Secondly, standardization of anesthesia regimens across PVIs was proposed, which would better allow for inter-PVI comparisons despite the potential need for some anesthesiologists to depart from their usual anesthetic routines. The protocol proposed at this stage remained in the preoperative setting but included the possibility of an intraoperative component. These meetings also confirmed that our expert panel would have appropriate representation from all the key stakeholders.

Phase 1b (Refine)

Expert Panel Recruitment

Twelve members were recruited for the expert panel, comprising two vascular surgeons with experience in clinical trials (AD, ME), one academic endocrine surgeon (AS), two academic vascular anesthesiologists (HC, JS), two vascular operating room nurses (EB, KP), two perioperative care unit nurses (AF, LM), one radiation technologist (AB), an integrative medicine nurse practitioner (MB) and a physician with clinical and research expertise in mind-body medicine (GY). All twelve-panel members were retained throughout the study period.

Modified Delphi Panel process

The modified Delphi process was completed, and consensus (pre-determined as a mean score of less than 1.50) was achieved after three iterations. The first round resulted in a mean score of 1.81, the second round in a mean score of 1.55, and the third round in a mean score of 1.45, thus completing the process. (Figure 2) The statement that consistently saw the best score was statement 2: “This guided meditation program as described could help decrease periprocedural patient anxiety.” The statement that saw the most significant improvement between the first and final rounds was statement 5: “This guided meditation program as described has the potential to ease the burden of patient care on operating room providers.” this statement improved from a mean score of 2.0 to 1.5. The cumulative distributions of the panel’s responses are displayed in Figure 3.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Critical areas of modification/improvement were the timing of existing perioperative workflow, duration of guided meditation sessions, environmental considerations, specific modality, contingencies, script content and distribution across recordings, and recording pace.

Final Protocol

The final protocol provided a robust framework for the MBI; below are several fundamental tenets that were refined by the expert panel:

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Discussion

In a systematic approach, we successfully designed a novel MBI in the form of a guided meditation with elements of mindfulness and guided imagery for patients undergoing PVIs under PSA. To our knowledge, this is the first MBI with tailored content specific to a surgical procedure, both within and outside vascular surgery. Additionally, it is the first MBI to specifically target the intra-operative needs of the patient and clinical team during surgery by aiming to increase patient compliance with on-table instruction regarding breath holds and maintaining ipsilateral leg stability.

Our recent nationwide survey of vascular surgeons shows that patient cooperation during PVIs is essential and provides strong rationale for this MBI intervention to have immense benefits regarding perioperative anxiolysis and patient compliance, with few potential risks, particularly compared to pharmacologic agents.7,30 Via the established ORBIT framework and the modified Delphi technique, the design of this intervention has resulted in a protocol that has taken into account the complex perioperative setting, time and efficiency of the operating room flow, and the needs and preferences of the perioperative staff and the greatest chance of being clinical efficacious while still minimizing any potential disruption to the existing operating room workflow. The following steps include a subsequent Phase 2A proof-of-concept pilot study in patients undergoing PVI under PSA to inform the feasibility and acceptability of the MBI. (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05837481)

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

Funding

The research reported in this publication was supported by the Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research. (F32HS028943; Principal Investigator: C.Y. Maximilian Png)

Conflict of interest

The authors report no potential conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Jon Kabat-Zinn, Ph.D., for providing consultation regarding our study and for personally editing a preliminary iteration of our guided meditation script.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Kassahun WT, Mehdorn M, Wagner TC, et al. The effect of preoperative patient-reported anxiety on morbidity and mortality outcomes in patients undergoing major general surgery. Sci Rep 2022;12(1):6312, doi:10.1038/s41598-022-10302-z
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. 2.↵
    Ramsay MA. A survey of pre-operative fear. Anaesthesia 1972;27(4):396–402, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.1972.tb08244.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    Jovanovic K, Kalezic N, Sipetic Grujicic S, et al. Preoperative Anxiety is Associated With Postoperative Complications in Vascular Surgery: A Cross-Sectional Study. World J Surg 2022;46(8):1987–1996, doi:10.1007/s00268-022-06575-0
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. 4.↵
    Delewi R, Vlastra W, Rohling WJ, et al. Anxiety levels of patients undergoing coronary procedures in the catheterization laboratory. Int J Cardiol 2017;228(926–930, doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.11.043
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. 5.↵
    Png CYM, Korayem A, Finlay DJ. Post-General Anesthesia Ultrasound-Guided Venous Mapping Increases Autogenous Access Placement Rates. Ann Vasc Surg 2018;51(132–140, doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2018.02.015
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. 6.↵
    Png CYM, Kim Y, Jessula S, et al. Reassuring Intraoperative Parameters Do Not Obviate the Need for Infrainguinal Bypass Completion Angiograms. Ann Surg 2023;277(5):e1164–e1168, doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000005363
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. 7.↵
    Png CYM, Boitano LT, Srivastava SD, et al. Room for improvement in patient compliance during peripheral vascular interventions. JVS Vasc Insights 2024;2(doi:10.1016/j.jvsvi.2024.100059
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    Bhasin MK, Denninger JW, Huffman JC, et al. Specific Transcriptome Changes Associated with Blood Pressure Reduction in Hypertensive Patients After Relaxation Response Training. J Altern Complement Med 2018;24(5):486–504, doi:10.1089/acm.2017.0053
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2018;138(17):e426–e483, doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000597
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    Ratcliff CG, Prinsloo S, Chaoul A, et al. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Brief Mindfulness Meditation for Women Undergoing Stereotactic Breast Biopsy. J Am Coll Radiol 2019;16(5):691–699, doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2018.09.009
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. 11.
    Bradt J, Dileo C, Shim M. Music interventions for preoperative anxiety. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;6):CD006908, doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006908.pub2
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. 12.
    Powell R, Scott NW, Manyande A, et al. Psychological preparation and postoperative outcomes for adults undergoing surgery under general anaesthesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;5):CD008646, doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008646.pub2
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. 13.
    Nelson EA, Dowsey MM, Knowles SR, et al. Systematic review of the efficacy of pre-surgical mind-body based therapies on post-operative outcome measures. Complement Ther Med 2013;21(6):697–711, doi:10.1016/j.ctim.2013.08.020
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.
    Goldmann L, Ogg TW, Levey AB. Hypnosis and daycase anaesthesia. A study to reduce pre-operative anxiety and intra-operative anaesthetic requirements. Anaesthesia 1988;43(6):466–9, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.1988.tb06633.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.
    Diaz M, Larsen B. Preparing for successful surgery: an implementation study. Perm J 2005;9(3):23–7, doi:10.7812/tpp/04-073
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.
    Tusek D, Church JM, Fazio VW. Guided imagery as a coping strategy for perioperative patients. AORN J 1997;66(4):644–9, doi:10.1016/s0001-2092(06)62917-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    Lang EV, Benotsch EG, Fick LJ, et al. Adjunctive non-pharmacological analgesia for invasive medical procedures: a randomised trial. Lancet 2000;355(9214):1486–90, doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02162-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    Lang EV, Rosen MP. Cost analysis of adjunct hypnosis with sedation during outpatient interventional radiologic procedures. Radiology 2002;222(2):375–82, doi:10.1148/radiol.2222010528
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    Rolving N, Nielsen CV, Christensen FB, et al. Preoperative cognitive-behavioural intervention improves in-hospital mobilisation and analgesic use for lumbar spinal fusion patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2016;17(217, doi:10.1186/s12891-016-1078-8
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. 20.↵
    Kiran U, Ladha S, Makhija N, et al. The role of Rajyoga meditation for modulation of anxiety and serum cortisol in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: A prospective randomized control study. Ann Card Anaesth 2017;20(2):158–162, doi:10.4103/aca.ACA_32_17
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. 21.↵
    Canfield MJ, Cremins MS, Vellanky SS, et al. Evaluating the Success of Perioperative Self-Guided Meditation in Reducing Sleep Disturbance After Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2021, doi:10.1016/j.arth.2021.01.070
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. 22.↵
    Packiasabapathy S, Susheela AT, Mueller A, et al. Guided meditation as an adjunct to enhance postoperative recovery after cardiac surgery: study protocol for a prospective randomized controlled feasibility trial. Trials 2019;20(1):39, doi:10.1186/s13063-018-3103-8
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. 23.↵
    Hanley AW, Gililland J, Erickson J, et al. Brief preoperative mind-body therapies for total joint arthroplasty patients: a randomized controlled trial. Pain 2021;162(6):1749–1757, doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002195
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. 24.
    Hanley AW, Gililland J, Garland EL. To be mindful of the breath or pain: Comparing two brief preoperative mindfulness techniques for total joint arthroplasty patients. J Consult Clin Psychol 2021;89(7):590–600, doi:10.1037/ccp0000657
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. 25.↵
    Abensur Vuillaume L, Gentilhomme C, Weber S, et al. Effectiveness of Hypnosis for the Prevention of Anxiety During Coronary Angiography (HYPCOR study): a prospective randomized study. BMC Complement Med Ther 2022;22(1):315, doi:10.1186/s12906-022-03792-x
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. 26.↵
    Czajkowski SM, Powell LH, Adler N, et al. From ideas to efficacy: The ORBIT model for developing behavioral treatments for chronic diseases. Health Psychol 2015;34(10):971–82, doi:10.1037/hea0000161
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    Williams JMG. The mindful way through depression: freeing yourself from chronic unhappiness. Guilford Press: New York; 2007.
  28. 28.↵
    In: Trauma-Informed Care in Behavioral Health Services. Rockville (MD); 2014.
  29. 29.
    Kim H, Newman MG. The paradox of relaxation training: Relaxation induced anxiety and mediation effects of negative contrast sensitivity in generalized anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord 2019;259(271-278, doi:10.1016/j.jad.2019.08.045
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. 30.↵
    Wright JD, Cogan JC, Huang Y, et al. Association of New Perioperative Benzodiazepine Use With Persistent Benzodiazepine Use. JAMA Netw Open 2021;4(6):e2112478, doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.12478
    OpenUrlCrossRef
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted June 08, 2024.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Designing a Perioperative Mind-Body Intervention for Peripheral Vascular Interventions
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Designing a Perioperative Mind-Body Intervention for Peripheral Vascular Interventions
C. Y. Maximilian, Darshan Mehta, Anahita Dua, Antonia Stephen, Alex M. Bruce, Aynsley Forsythe, Hovig V. Chitilian, Erik J. Bringle, James C. Simpson, Katherine M. Parady, Lisa A. McNeil, Margaret A. Baim, Matthew J. Eagleton, David C. Chang, Gloria Y. Yeh
medRxiv 2024.06.07.24308071; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.07.24308071
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Designing a Perioperative Mind-Body Intervention for Peripheral Vascular Interventions
C. Y. Maximilian, Darshan Mehta, Anahita Dua, Antonia Stephen, Alex M. Bruce, Aynsley Forsythe, Hovig V. Chitilian, Erik J. Bringle, James C. Simpson, Katherine M. Parady, Lisa A. McNeil, Margaret A. Baim, Matthew J. Eagleton, David C. Chang, Gloria Y. Yeh
medRxiv 2024.06.07.24308071; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.07.24308071

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Cardiovascular Medicine
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)