Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Individualized Machine-learning-based Clinical Assessment Recommendation System

Devin Setiawan, Yumiko Wiranto, Jeffrey M. Girard, Amber Watts, Arian Ashourvan
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.24.24310941
Devin Setiawan
1The University of Kansas, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 1415 Jayhawk Blvd. Lawrence, KS 66045
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: devinryandi.s{at}gmail.com
Yumiko Wiranto
2The University of Kansas, Department of Psychology, 1415 Jayhawk Blvd. Lawrence, KS 66045
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey M. Girard
2The University of Kansas, Department of Psychology, 1415 Jayhawk Blvd. Lawrence, KS 66045
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amber Watts
2The University of Kansas, Department of Psychology, 1415 Jayhawk Blvd. Lawrence, KS 66045
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arian Ashourvan
2The University of Kansas, Department of Psychology, 1415 Jayhawk Blvd. Lawrence, KS 66045
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Traditional clinical assessments often lack individualization, relying on standardized procedures that may not accommodate the diverse needs of patients, especially in early stages where personalized diagnosis could offer significant benefits. We aim to provide a machine-learning framework that addresses the individualized feature addition problem and enhances diagnostic accuracy for clinical assessments.

Methods Individualized Clinical Assessment Recommendation System (iCARE) employs locally weighted logistic regression and Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) value analysis to tailor feature selection to individual patient characteristics. Evaluations were conducted on synthetic and real-world datasets, including early-stage diabetes risk prediction and heart failure clinical records from the UCI Machine Learning Repository. We compared the performance of iCARE with a Global approach using statistical analysis on accuracy and area under the ROC curve (AUC) to select the best additional features.

Findings The iCARE framework enhances predictive accuracy and AUC metrics when additional features exhibit distinct predictive capabilities, as evidenced by synthetic datasets 1-3 and the early diabetes dataset. Specifically, in synthetic dataset 1, iCARE achieved an accuracy of 0·999 and an AUC of 1·000, outperforming the Global approach with an accuracy of 0·689 and an AUC of 0·639. In the early diabetes dataset, iCARE shows improvements of 1·5-3·5% in accuracy and AUC across different numbers of initial features. Conversely, in synthetic datasets 4-5 and the heart failure dataset, where features lack discernible predictive distinctions, iCARE shows no significant advantage over global approaches on accuracy and AUC metrics.

Interpretation iCARE provides personalized feature recommendations that enhance diagnostic accuracy in scenarios where individualized approaches are critical, improving the precision and effectiveness of medical diagnoses.

Funding This work was supported by startup funding from the Department of Psychology at the University of Kansas provided to A.A., and the R01MH125740 award from NIH partially supported J.M.G.’s work.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by startup funding from the Department of Psychology at the University of Kansas provided to A.A., and the R01MH125740 award from NIH partially supported J.M.G.'s work.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The study used ONLY openly available human data that were originally located at: 1. https://doi.org/10.24432/C5VG8H 2. https://doi.org/10.24432/C5Z89R

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All synthetic data generation procedure are contained in the supplementary document. The real-world datasets are available online at https://doi.org/10.24432/C5VG8H and https://doi.org/10.24432/C5Z89R.

https://doi.org/10.24432/C5VG8H

https://doi.org/10.24432/C5Z89R

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 24, 2024.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Individualized Machine-learning-based Clinical Assessment Recommendation System
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Individualized Machine-learning-based Clinical Assessment Recommendation System
Devin Setiawan, Yumiko Wiranto, Jeffrey M. Girard, Amber Watts, Arian Ashourvan
medRxiv 2024.07.24.24310941; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.24.24310941
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Individualized Machine-learning-based Clinical Assessment Recommendation System
Devin Setiawan, Yumiko Wiranto, Jeffrey M. Girard, Amber Watts, Arian Ashourvan
medRxiv 2024.07.24.24310941; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.24.24310941

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Informatics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)