Abstract
The genetic liability to a complex phenotype is calculated as the sum of genotypes, weighted by effect size estimates derived from summary statistics of genome-wide association study (GWAS) data. Due to different allele frequencies (AF) and linkage disequilibrium (LD) patterns across populations, polygenic risk scores (PRS) that were developed on one population drop drastically in predictive performance when transferred to another. One of the major factors contributing to AF and LD heterogeneity is genetic drift, which acts strongly during population bottlenecks and is influenced by the dominance of certain alleles. In particular, since the causal variants on empirical data are typically not known, the presence of population specific LD-patterns will strongly affect transferability of PRS models. In this work, we therefore conducted demographic simulations to investigate the influence of the dominance coefficient on the transferability of PRS among European, African and Asian populations. By modifying the length and size of the bottleneck leading to the split of Eurasian and African populations, we gain a deeper understanding of the underlying dynamics. Finally, we illustrate that PRS models that are adapted to the underlying dominance coefficient can substantially increase their prediction performance in out-of-target populations.
Significance Statement Polygenic risk scores (PRS) are increasingly used in clinical care for the management of many complex disorders such as breast cancer or cardiovascular diseases. Since heritability should be independent of ancestry so should be the predictability of the models. This is, however, currently not the case and the missing transferability of PRS is favoring individuals from European descent, who represent the largest population to train PRS. In this work we study on simulated populations what degree of transferability is theoretically achievable under different demographic models and dominance coefficients of the pathogenic variants. The results of our work are twofold: the effect of genetic drift and selection on the transferability can be quantified in simulations and recessive traits are more conserved.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵1 Peter Krawitz. E-mail: pkrawitz{at}uni-bonn.de
H.K. and P.M.K. designed research, L.F. performed research, L.F., H.K. and P.M.K. analyzed data, L.F., A.M., C.M., C.S., H.K. and P.M.K. wrote the paper.
Data Availability
All data produced are available online at: https://github.com/fohler/PRS_transferability.
