Abstract
Background Gastric cancer poses a severe risk to public health and has a substantial financial impact. Tumor markers such as CEA, CA125, CA19-9, and others, as well as the fecal occult blood test (FOBT), are frequently utilized for gastric cancer screening and initial diagnosis. however, False-positive results of FOBT and other markers will cause needless mental suffering, costly examination costs, examination injuries, and other unfavorable consequences. False-negative results of FOBT and other markers will cause treatment to be delayed, which will force patients to suffer from a poor prognosis, high treatment costs, a low quality of life, and a short survival period. Finding practical, affordable, and non-invasive diagnostic techniques is crucial to lowering the false-positive and false-negative rates of FOBT and other markers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of YiDiXie™-SS and YiDiXie™-HS in gastric cancer.
Patients and methods This study included 602 subjects (Malignant group, n=222; Benign group, n=380 cases). The remaining serum samples of the subjects were collected and the sensitivity and specificity of the YiDiXie™-SS and YiDiXie™-HS were evaluated using the YiDiXie™ all-cancer detection kit.
Results The sensitivity of YiDiXie ™ -SS in patients with positive FOBT, CEA, CA125, and CA19-9 were 100% (95% CI: 77.2%-100%), 96.7% (95% CI: 83.3% - 99.8%), 95.5% (95% CI: 78.2%- 99.8%), 97.1% (95% CI: 85.1%- 99.8%); The Specificity degrees were 75.0% (95% CI: 30.1%- 98.7%), 73.3% (95% CI: 48.0%- 89.1%), 66.7% (95% CI: 30.0%- 94.1%), 66.7% (95% CI: 35.4%-87.9%). This means that the application of YiDiXie ™ -SS, without basically increasing the missed diagnosis of malignant tumors, reduced the false-positive rates of FOBT, CEA, CA125, and CA19-9 by 75.0% (95% CI: 30.1%-98.7%), 73.3% (95% CI: 48.0% - 89.1%), 66.7% (95% CI: 30.0% -94.1%), 66.7% (95% CI: 35.4% -87.9%). The sensitivity of YiDiXie™-HS in FOBT, CEA, CA125, and CA19-9 negative patients was 96.5% (95%CI: 90.2-99.0%) and 96.8% (95%CI: 93.2% - 98.5%), 97.3% (95% CI: 93.8%- 98.8%), 96.7% (95% CI: 93.0%- 98.5%); The specific degrees were 86.4% (95% CI: 66.7%- 95.3%), 89.3% (95% CI: 85.7%- 92.1%), 89.5% (95% CI: 84.6%- 93.0%), 90.4% (95% CI: 86.8%-93.1%). This means that YiDiXie ™ -HS reduced false-negatives for FOBT, CEA, CA125, and CA19-9 by 96.5% (95% CI: 90.2% to 99.0%) and 96.8% (95% CI: 93.2% - 98.5%), 97.3% (95% CI: 93.8%- 98.8%), 96.7% (95% CI: 93.0%- 98.5%).
Conclusion YiDiXie ™ -SS significantly reduced false-positive rates of FOBT, CEA, CA125 and CA19-9 without substantially increasing delayed treatment of malignant tumors. YiDiXie™-HS significantly reduced false-negative rates for FOBT, CEA, CA125 and CA19-9. YiDiXie™-SS and YiDiXie™-HS have important diagnostic value in gastric cancer, and are expected to solve the two problems of “high false-positive rate of FOBT and other markers” and “high false-negative rate of FOBT and other markers” in gastric cancer.
Clinical trial number ChiCTR2200066840.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
ChiCTR2200066840
Funding Statement
This work was supported by Shenzhen High-level Hospital Construction Fund, Clinical Research Project of Peking University Shenzhen Hospital (LCYJ2020002, LCYJ2020015, LCYJ2020020, LCYJ2017001).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee of Peking University Shenzhen Hospital gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are contained in the manuscript.
