Abstract
Background Gastric cancer poses a severe risk to public health and has a substantial financial impact. Tumor markers such as CEA, CA125, CA19-9, and others, as well as the fecal occult blood test (FOBT), are frequently utilized for gastric cancer screening and initial diagnosis. however, False-positive results of FOBT and other markers will cause needless mental suffering, costly examination costs, examination injuries, and other unfavorable consequences. False-negative results of FOBT and other markers will cause treatment to be delayed, which will force patients to suffer from a poor prognosis, high treatment costs, a low quality of life, and a short survival period. Finding practical, affordable, and non-invasive diagnostic techniques is crucial to lowering the false-positive and false-negative rates of FOBT and other markers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of YiDiXie™-SS and YiDiXie™-HS in gastric cancer.
Patients and methods This study included 602 subjects (Malignant group, n=222; Benign group, n=380 cases). The remaining serum samples of the subjects were collected and the sensitivity and specificity of the YiDiXie™-SS and YiDiXie™-HS were evaluated using the YiDiXie™ all-cancer detection kit.
Results The sensitivity of YiDiXie ™ -SS in patients with positive FOBT, CEA, CA125, and CA19-9 were 100% (95% CI: 77.2%-100%), 96.7% (95% CI: 83.3% - 99.8%), 95.5% (95% CI: 78.2%- 99.8%), 97.1% (95% CI: 85.1%- 99.8%); The Specificity degrees were 75.0% (95% CI: 30.1%- 98.7%), 73.3% (95% CI: 48.0%- 89.1%), 66.7% (95% CI: 30.0%- 94.1%), 66.7% (95% CI: 35.4%-87.9%). This means that the application of YiDiXie ™ -SS, without basically increasing the missed diagnosis of malignant tumors, reduced the false-positive rates of FOBT, CEA, CA125, and CA19-9 by 75.0% (95% CI: 30.1%-98.7%), 73.3% (95% CI: 48.0% - 89.1%), 66.7% (95% CI: 30.0% -94.1%), 66.7% (95% CI: 35.4% -87.9%). The sensitivity of YiDiXie™-HS in FOBT, CEA, CA125, and CA19-9 negative patients was 96.5% (95%CI: 90.2-99.0%) and 96.8% (95%CI: 93.2% - 98.5%), 97.3% (95% CI: 93.8%- 98.8%), 96.7% (95% CI: 93.0%- 98.5%); The specific degrees were 86.4% (95% CI: 66.7%- 95.3%), 89.3% (95% CI: 85.7%- 92.1%), 89.5% (95% CI: 84.6%- 93.0%), 90.4% (95% CI: 86.8%-93.1%). This means that YiDiXie ™ -HS reduced false-negatives for FOBT, CEA, CA125, and CA19-9 by 96.5% (95% CI: 90.2% to 99.0%) and 96.8% (95% CI: 93.2% - 98.5%), 97.3% (95% CI: 93.8%- 98.8%), 96.7% (95% CI: 93.0%- 98.5%).
Conclusion YiDiXie ™ -SS significantly reduced false-positive rates of FOBT, CEA, CA125 and CA19-9 without substantially increasing delayed treatment of malignant tumors. YiDiXie™-HS significantly reduced false-negative rates for FOBT, CEA, CA125 and CA19-9. YiDiXie™-SS and YiDiXie™-HS have important diagnostic value in gastric cancer, and are expected to solve the two problems of “high false-positive rate of FOBT and other markers” and “high false-negative rate of FOBT and other markers” in gastric cancer.
Clinical trial number ChiCTR2200066840.
INTRODUCTION
Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors. In 2022, there were more than 968,000 new cases of gastric cancer and nearly 660,000 deaths, ranking among the highest in the world in terms of morbidity and mortality1. Over the past half century, gastric cancer incidence and mortality have been high in most populations2-3. Recent studies have shown an increasing incidence in younger age groups, especially in low-incidence populations4-5. The overall survival rate of early gastric cancer (GC) can exceed 96% whether it is treated by endoscopy or surgery6, but most cancer cases are diagnosed at an advanced stage. The median survival rate in the late stage is less than 12 months7. The 5-year survival rate in other European and American countries fluctuates in the range of 15%-30%, except for Japan, which is relatively high8-9. Gastric cancer, as a highly aggressive malignancy, remains a global health problem today10.
On the one hand, due to the convenience, Fecal occult blood test (FOBT) and CEA, CA125, CA19-9 and other tumor markers are widely used in the screening or preliminary diagnosis of gastric cancer. For FOBT positive patients, the prevalence of FOBT positive upper digestive tract lesions was as common as that of lower digestive tract lesions11. The source of FOBT positive rates in the upper digestive tract alone is mainly determined by the prevalence of gastric cancer and Helicobacter pylori12-14. H. pylori may cause a higher incidence of gastrointestinal ulcers or mucosal inflammation, and 1/3 of FOBT-positive patients have normal EGD, most patients who received EGD were found to have inflammation of the gastrointestinal mucosa: non-erosive gastritis (30.7%), duodenitis (9.8%), esophagitis (4.9%) and erosive gastritis (1.7%)15. Therefore, there are many reasons for positive FOBT results, and gastric cancer is only one of them, resulting in a high false-positive rate of FOBT for gastric cancer. As traditional tumor markers, CEA, CA125 and CA19-9 are expressed in a variety of cancers and even benign diseases. Therefore, the specificity of gastric cancer diagnosis is not high, It also produces a high false positive rate16-20. Studies have shown that the false-positive rate of CEA for gastric cancer diagnosis is as high as 33%21. When FOBT, CEA, CA125, CA19-9 and other markers are positive, patients usually undergo endoscopy and biopsy22-24. False-positive results of FOBT and other markers mean that patients have received unnecessary endoscopy, and patients may face adverse consequences such as infection, mental distress, expensive examination costs, and examination injuries. Therefore, there is an urgent need to find a convenient, economical and non-invasive diagnostic method to reduce the false-positive rate of FOBT and other markers.
On the other hand, because early gastric cancer usually has no symptoms, tests such as FOBT do not detect early stomach cancer, and the sensitivity is extremely low. By the time stomach cancer is diagnosed because it is positive for FOBT, most stomach cancers are advanced and difficult to cure25. The positive rates of the same four markers of early gastric cancer (CEA, CA125, CA19-9) varied greatly. The positive rate of CEA has been reported to be 4.3% to 15.4%26-29. The positive rate of CA19-9 was 4.8%-11.7%28-29, and the positive rate of CA125 was 1.9%-6.7%29-30. Even the combined positive rate of multiple markers was only 10.4%29. However, only very few tumor markers that should be diagnosed as positive are correctly diagnosed, with a false-negative rate of more than 90%, which means that even the combination of tumor markers in the diagnosis of early gastric cancer is extremely low. When FOBT and other markers are negative, patients are usually observed and regularly followed up, and only in areas with high incidence of gastric cancer will endoscopic screening be performed again22-24. False-negative results of FOBT and other markers mean that malignant tumors are misdiagnosed as benign diseases, which may lead to delayed treatment, the progression of malignant tumors, and even the development of advanced stages. Therefore, patients will have to bear the adverse consequences of poor prognosis, high treatment costs, poor quality of life, and short survival. Therefore, it is urgent to find a convenient, economical and non-invasive diagnostic method to reduce the false-negative rate of FOBT and other markers.
Based on the detection of novel tumor markers of miRNA in serum, Shenzhen KeRuiDa Health Technology Co., Ltd. has developed an in vitro diagnostic test product YiDiXie ™ all-cancer test (the YiDiXie™ test).31 With just 200μl of whole blood or 100 μl of serum at a time, many cancer types can be detected31. the YiDiXie™ test includes three products with different performance: YiDiXie™-HS, YiDiXie™-SS, and YiDiXie™-D31.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of YiDiXie™-SS and YiDiXie™-HS in gastric cancer.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Study design
This work is part of the SZ-PILOT study (ChiCTR2200066840), “Evaluating the value of the YiDiXie™ test as an adjunct diagnostic in multiple tumors”.
The SZ-PILOT study (ChiCTR2200066840) was a single-center, prospective, observational study. Subjects who signed the pan-informed consent to donate the remaining samples at admission or physical examination were included, and 0.5ml of their remaining serum samples were collected for this study.
Blind method was used in this study. Neither the experimentor conducting the YiDiXie™ test nor the KeRuiDa laboratory technicians who determined the YiDiXie™ test results were aware of the study subjects’ clinical profiles. The results of the YiDiXie ™ test were also not known to the clinical experts who evaluated the subjects’ clinical data.
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking University Shenzhen Hospital and carried out in accordance with the International Coordination Conference on Quality Management of Drug Clinical Trials and the Declaration of Helsinki.
Participants
Subjects with gastric cancer and gastric benign diseases with FOBT, CEA, CA125 and CA19-9 detection data were included in this study. Subjects in the two groups were separately enrolled, and all subjects meeting the inclusion criteria were continuously included.
This study initially included hospitalized patients with “suspected (solid or blood) malignancy” who signed a pan-informed consent to donate the remaining samples. Subjects with postoperative pathological diagnosis of “malignant tumor” were included in the malignant group, and those with postoperative pathological diagnosis of “benign disease” were included in the benign group. Ambiguous pathological results were excluded from this study. The benign group also included healthy checkers with colonoscopy results. Part of the samples from the malignant tumor group and healthy physical examination samples from the benign group were used in other previous studies of our group31.
Subjects whose serum samples were disqualified prior to the YiDiXie ™ test were excluded from the study. For specific information on inclusion and exclusion, refer to the previous articles of our group31.
Sample collection, processing
The serum samples used in this study were taken from serum remaining after normal treatment and no additional blood was drawn. Approximately 0.5ml serum samples were collected from the remaining serum of medical laboratory subjects and stored at -80 °C for subsequent the YiDiXie™ test.
The YiDiXie test
The YiDiXie ™ test was performed using YiDiXie ™ all-cancer detection kit. YiDiXie ™ all-cancer detection kit is an in vitro diagnostic kit developed and produced by Shenzhen KeRuiDa Health Technology Co., Ltd. for fluorescent quantitative PCR instrument31. It detects the expression levels of dozens of miRNA biomarkers in blood serum to determine whether cancer is present in the subject’s body.31 It pre-defines appropriate thresholds for each miRNA biomarker, thus ensuring that each miRNA biomarker has high specificity, and integrates these independent assays through a parallel assay model to significantly increase sensitivity and maintain higher specificity for broad-spectrum cancers.31
The YiDiXie™ test includes three different test products: YiDiXie™-HS, YiDiXie™-SS, and YiDiXie™ -D. YiDiXie ™ -HS was developed with sensitivity and specificity in mind. YiDiXie ™ -SS significantly increases the number of miRNA trials to achieve extremely high sensitivity for all clinical stages of all malignancies. YiDiXie ™ -Diagnosis (YiDiXie ™ -D) dramatically increases the diagnostic threshold for a single miRNA test to achieve extremely high specificity for all malignancies.31
The YiDiXie™ test was performed according to the instructions for the YiDiXie ™ all cancer detection kit. For details, refer to the previous articles of our group31.
The original test results were analyzed by laboratory technicians of Shenzhen KeRuiDa Health Technology Co., Ltd., and the YiDiXie™ test results were determined to be “positive” or “negative”31.
Extraction of clinical data
The clinical, pathological, laboratory and imaging data in this study were extracted from patients’ hospital records or physical examination reports. Clinical staging was evaluated by trained clinicians according to the AJCC Staging Manual (7th or 8th edition)32-33.
Statistical analyses
For demographic and baseline characteristics, report descriptive statistics. For categorical variables, calculate the number and percentage of subjects in each category; For continuous variables, total number of subjects (n), mean, standard deviation (SD), or standard error (SE), median, first quartile (Q1), third quartile (Q3), minimum, and maximum are calculated. 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for multiple biomarkers using the Wilson (score) method.
RESULTS
Participant disposition
This study involved a total of 602 participants (222 malignant cases and 380 benign cases). The demographic and clinical characteristics of the 602 study participants are shown in Table 1.
Demographic and clinical variables were similar between the two research groups (Table 1). The average (standard deviation) age was 54.5 (12.14) years, with 40.0% (241/602) being female.
Diagnostic performance of YiDiXie™-SS and YiDiXie™-HS in FOBT-positive or negative patients
As shown in Table 2, the sensitivity and specificity of FOBT were 13.1% (95%CI: 7.8%-21.2%) and 84.6% (95%CI: 66.5-93.8%).
In order to solve the problem of high false-positive rate of FOBT, YiDiXie™-SS was applied to patients with positive FOBT. As shown in Table 3, the sensitivity and specificity of YiDiXie™-SS in FOBT positive patients were 100% (95%CI: 77.2%-100%) and 75.0% (95%CI: 30.1%-98.7%), respectively. This means that the application of YiDiXie™-SS reduced the false-positive rate of FOBT by 75.0% (95% CI: 30.1%-98.7%) with virtually no increase in missed malignancies.
In order to solve the problem of high false-negative rate of FOBT, YiDiXie ™ -HS was applied to FOBT negative patients. As shown in Table 4, sensitivity and specificity of YiDiXie™-HS in FOBT-negative patients were 96.5% (95%CI: 90.2% t-99.0%) and 87.5% (95%CI: 69.0%- 95.7%), respectively. This meant that the application of YiDiXie ™ -HS reduced the false-negative rate of FOBT by 96.5% (95% CI: 90.2% - 99.0%).
Diagnostic Performance of YiDiXie™-SS and YiDiXie™-HS in CEA-positive or negative patients
As shown in Table 5, the sensitivity and specificity of CEA were 13.8% (95%CI: 9.9%-19.0%) and 96.0% (95%CI: 93.6% -97.6%).
In order to solve the problem of high false positive rate of CEA, YiDiXie™-SS was applied to CEA positive patients. As shown in Table 6, sensitivity and specificity of YiDiXie™-SS in CEA positive patients were 96.7% (95%CI: 83.3%-99.8%) and 73.3% (95%CI: 48.0%-89.1%), respectively. This means that the application of YiDiXie™-SS reduced the CEA false-positive rate by 73.3% (95% CI: 48.0%-89.1%) with virtually no increase in missed malignancies.
In order to solve the problem of high CEA false negative rate, YiDiXie™-HS was applied to CEA negative patients. As shown in Table 7, sensitivity and specificity of YiDiXie™-HS in CEA-negative patients were 96.8% (95%CI: 93.2-98.5%) and 89.3% (95%CI: 85.7%-92.1%), respectively. This meant that the application of YiDiXie™-HS reduced the CEA false-negative rate by 96.8% (95% CI: 93.2-98.5%).
Diagnostic Performance of YiDiXie™-SS and YiDiXie™-HS in CA125-positive or negative patients
As shown in Table 8, the sensitivity and specificity of CA125 were 10.7% (95%CI: 7.2%-15.6%) and 97.2% (95%CI: 94.1%-98.7%).
In order to solve the problem of high false-positive rate of CA125, YiDiXie ™ -SS was applied to CA125 positive patients. As shown in Table 9, the sensitivity and specificity of YiDiXie ™ -SS in CA125 positive patients were 95.5% (95% CI: 78.2%-99.8%) and 66.7% (95% CI: 30.0%-94.1%).. This means that the application of YiDiXie™-SS reduced the false-positive rate of CA125 by 66.7% (95% CI: 30.0%-94.1%) without increasing the missed diagnosis of malignant tumors.
To solve the problem of high false negative rate of CA125, YiDiXie™-HS was applied to CA125-negative patients. As shown in Table 10, the sensitivity and specificity of YiDiXie™-HS in CA125-negative patients were 97.3% (95% CI: 93.8% - 98.8%) and 89.5% (95% CI: 84.6% - 93.0%), respectively. This meant that application of YiDiXie™-HS reduced the CA125 false-negative rate by 97.3% (95% CI: 93.8% - 98.8%).
Diagnostic performance of YiDiXie™-SS and YiDiXie™-HS in CA19-9-positive or negative patients
As shown in Table 11, the sensitivity and specificity of CA19-9 were 15.7% (95%CI: 11.5%-21.2%) and 97.4% (95%CI: 95.2%-98.6%).
In order to solve the problem of high false positive rate of CA19-9, YiDiXie™-SS was applied to CA19-9 positive patients. As shown in Table 12, the sensitivity and specificity of YiDiXie™-SS in CA19-9 positive patients were 97.1% (95% CI: 85.1%-99.8%) and 66.7% (95% CI: 35.4%-87.9%). This means that the application of YiDiXie™-SS reduced the false positive rate of CA19-9 by 66.7% (95% CI: 35.4%-87.9%) with virtually no increase in missed malignancies.
In order to solve the problem of high false negative rate of CA19-9, YiDiXie™-HS was applied to CA19-9 negative patients. As shown in Table 13, the sensitivity and specificity of YiDiXie™-HS in CA19-9-negative patients were 96.7% (95% CI: 93.0% to 98.5%) and 90.4% (95% CI: 86.8% to 93.1%), respectively. This meant that application of YiDiXie™-HS reduced the CA19-9 false-negative rate by 96.7% (95% CI: 93.0% to 98.5%).
DISCUSSION
Clinical significance of YiDiXie™-SS in patients with positive FOBT and other indicators
The YiDiXie™ test includes three different test products: YiDiXie™-HS, YiDiXie™-SS, and YiDiXie™-D.31 Among them, YiDiXie™-HS combines sensitivity and specificity, with high sensitivity and high specificity.31 YiDiXie™-SS is highly sensitive to all malignant tumor types, but slightly less specific.31 YiDiXie™-D is highly specific to all malignant tumor types, but has low sensitivity31.
For patients with positive markers such as FOBT, the sensitivity and specificity of further diagnostic methods are very important. Weighing the contradiction between sensitivity and specificity is essentially weighing the contradiction between “the harm of missing diagnosis of malignant tumors” and “the harm of misdiagnosis of benign tumors”. In general, when markers such as FOBT are positive, gastroscopy is usually accepted, rather than radical surgery. Therefore, false positives of FOBT and other markers do not lead to serious consequences such as major surgical trauma, organ resection and loss of function. In this way, for patients with positive markers such as FOBT, the “harm of missed diagnosis of malignant tumor” is much higher than the “harm of misdiagnosis of benign tumor”. Therefore, YiDiXie ™ -SS with extremely high sensitivity but slightly low specificity was selected to reduce the false positive rate of markers such as FOBT.
As shown in the results, the sensitivity of YiDiXie™-SS in patients with positive FOBT, CEA, CA125 and CA19-9 were 100% (95% CI: 77.2%-100%), 96.7% (95% CI: 83.3% - 99.8%), 95.5% (95% CI: 78.2%- 99.8%), 97.1% (95% CI: 85.1%- 99.8%); (Tables 3, 6, 9, ; The Specificity degrees were 75.0% (95% CI: 30.1%- 98.7%), 73.3% (95% CI: 48.0%- 89.1%), 66.7% (95% CI: 30.0%- 94.1%), 66.7% (95% CI: 35.4%-87.9%). (Table 3, Table 6, Table 9, Table 12). The above results show that: While maintaining a sensitivity close to 100%, YiDiXie™-SS reduced false positives for FOBT, CEA, CA125, and CA19-9 by 75.0% (95% CI: 30.1%-98.7%), 73.3% (95% CI: 48.0% - 89.1%), 66.7% (95% CI: 30.0% -94.1%), 66.7% (95% CI: 35.4% -87.9%).
These results mean that YiDiXie™-SS significantly reduces the probability of erroneous gastroscope for benign gastric disease, with virtually no increase in missed diagnosis of malignant tumors. In other words, YiDiXie™-SS significantly reduced mental distress, costly tests, and harm in patients with false-positive FOBT, CEA, CA125, and CA19-9 with virtually no increase in delayed treatment of malignant tumors. Therefore, YiDiXie™-SS well meets the clinical needs, has important clinical significance and wide application prospects.
Clinical significance of YiDiXie™-HS in patients with negative FOBT and other indicators
For patients with negative markers such as FOBT, the sensitivity and specificity of further diagnostic methods are very important. Weighing the contradiction between sensitivity and specificity is essentially weighing the contradiction between “the harm of missing diagnosis of malignant tumors” and “the harm of misdiagnosis of benign diseases”. The higher false negative rate means that more malignant tumors are missed, which will lead to delayed treatment, the progression of malignant tumors, and even the development of advanced stage. Therefore, patients will have to bear the adverse consequences of poor prognosis, short survival, poor quality of life, and high treatment costs. A higher false positive rate means that more benign diseases are misdiagnosed, leading to unnecessarily expensive and invasive colonoscopy. As a result, patients have to bear the negative consequences of mental pain, expensive tests, and examination injuries. Therefore, YiDiXie ™ -HS with high sensitivity and specificity was selected to reduce the false-negative rate of FOBT and other markers.
As shown in the results, the sensitivity of YiDiXie ™ -HS in FOBT, CEA, CA125, and CA19-9 negative patients was 96.5% (95%CI: 90.2-99.0%) and 96.8% (95%CI: 93.2% - 98.5%), 97.3% (95% CI: 93.8%-98.8%), 96.7% (95% CI: 93.0%- 98.5%)(Tables 4, 7, 10, 13); The specific degrees were were 86.4% (95% CI: 66.7%- 95.3%), 89.3% (95% CI: 85.7%- 92.1%), 89.5% (95% CI: 84.6%- 93.0%), 90.4% (95% CI: 86.8%-93.1%)(Tables 4, 7, 10, 13). The above results show that: YiDiXie™-HS reduced false negatives of FOBT, CEA, CA125 and CA19-9 by 96.5% (95%CI: 90.2-99.0%) and 96.8% (95%CI: 93.2% - 98.5%), 97.3% (95% CI: 93.8%- 98.8%), 96.7% (95% CI: 93.0%- 98.5%).
These results mean that YiDiXie™-HS significantly reduces the probability of false negative detection of malignant tumors by FOBT and other markers. In other words, YiDiXie™-HS significantly reduces the adverse consequences of poor prognosis, high treatment costs, poor quality of life, and short survival for patients with false negative diagnosis of FOBT and other markers. Therefore, YiDiXie™-HS well meets the clinical needs and has important clinical significance and wide application prospects.
YiDiXie™-SS and YiDiXie™-HS promise to address 2 challenges in gastric cancer
First, YiDiXie ™ -SS can greatly relieve the unnecessary work pressure of digestive endoscopy physicians, and promote the timely diagnosis and timely treatment of malignant tumor cases that were originally delayed. When markers such as FOBT are positive, the patient usually receives a gastroscope. Whether these colonoscopies can be completed in a timely manner directly depends on the number of digestive endoscopists. In many parts of the world, reservations can take months or even more than a year. This inevitably delays the treatment of malignant tumor cases, so it is not uncommon to see malignant tumor progression or even distant metastasis in patients with positive markers such as FOBT waiting for colonoscopy. As shown in the results, YiDiXie ™ -SS reduced the false-positive rates of FOBT, CEA, CA125 and CA19-9 by 75.0% (95%CI: 30.1%-98.7%) and 73.3% (95%CI: 48.0% - 89.1%), 66.7% (95% CI: 30.0%- 94.1%), 66.7% (95% CI: 35.4%- 87.9%) without increasing the missed diagnosis of malignant tumors.. Therefore, YiDiXie ™ -SS can greatly relieve the unnecessary work pressure of digestive endoscopists, and facilitate the timely diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer or other diseases that have been delayed.
Second, YiDiXie™-HS significantly reduces the risk of missed gastric cancer. When FOBT and other markers are negative, the possibility of gastric cancer is usually temporarily ruled out. Due to the high false-negative rate of FOBT and other markers, a large number of gastric cancer patients have delayed treatment. As shown in the results, YiDiXie ™-HS reduced false negatives of FOBT, CEA, CA125, and CA19-9 by 96.5% (95%CI: 90.2-99.0%) and 96.8% (95%CI: 93.2% - 98.5%), 97.3% (95% CI: 93.8%- 98.8%), 96.7% (95% CI: 93.0%- 98.5%). Therefore, YiDiXie ™ -HS significantly reduces the probability of false-negative missed malignant tumors by markers such as FOBT, and promotes timely diagnosis and treatment for gastric cancer patients who were previously delayed.
Final, the YiDiXie™ test enables “just-in-time diagnosis” for gastric cancer patients. On the one hand, the YiDiXie ™ test requires only a tiny amount of blood, allowing patients to complete the diagnostic process without leaving their homes. The YiDiXie™ test requires only 20 μl of serum to complete, which is about the same amount as 1 drop of whole blood (1 drop of whole blood is about 50 μl, which produces 20-25μl of serum)31. Taking into account the sample quality assessment test before detection and 2-3 repetitions, 0.2 ml of whole blood was sufficient to complete the YiDiXie™ test31. Ordinary subjects can use the finger blood collection needle to complete 0.2 ml finger blood collection at home, without the need for intravenous blood collection by medical personnel, and patients can complete the diagnosis process without leaving the house31.
The YiDiXie ™ test, on the other hand, has a nearly unlimited diagnostic capacity. The basic flow diagram of the YiDiXie™ test in Figure 1 shows that the YiDiXie ™ test not only does not require a doctor and medical equipment, but also does not require medical personnel to collect blood. As a result, the YiDiXie™ test is completely independent of the number of medical personnel and facilities, and its testing capacity is nearly unlimited. As a result, the YiDiXie ™ test enables “just-in-time diagnosis” for gastric cancer patients without the anxiety of waiting for an appointment.
Basic flowchart of the YiDiXie™ test.
In short, the YiDiXie™ test has important diagnostic value in gastric cancer, which is expected to solve the two problems of “too high false-positive rate of FOBT and other markers” and “too high false-negative rate of FOBT and other markers” in gastric cancer.
Limitations of the study
Firstly, the number of cases in this study is small, and future clinical studies with a larger sample size are needed for further evaluation.
Secondly, this study is a control study of inpatients with malignant tumors and benign tumors, and future cohort studies of natural lung tumors are needed for further evaluation.
Finally, this study is a single-center study, which may lead to a certain degree of bias in the results of this study. Future multi-center studies are needed for further evaluation.
CONCLUSION
YiDiXie ™ -SS significantly reduced false-positive rates of FOBT, CEA, CA125 and CA19-9 without substantially increasing delayed treatment of malignant tumors. YiDiXie ™ -HS significantly reduced false-negative rates for FOBT, CEA, CA125 and CA19-9. YiDiXie™-SS and YiDiXie™ -HS have important diagnostic value in gastric cancer, and are expected to solve the two problems of “high false-positive rate of FOBT and other markers” and “high false-negative rate of FOBT and other markers” in gastric cancer.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are contained in the manuscript.
FUNDING
This study was supported by Shenzhen High-level Hospital Construction Fund, Clinical Research Project of Peking University Shenzhen Hospital (LCYJ2020002, LCYJ2020015, LCYJ2020020, LCYJ2017001).
REFERENCES
