Abstract
Background Angulation of virtual basal ring (VBR), also known as aortic annulus, in relation to sino-tubular joint (STJ) may lead to greater exposure of implanted stent to the conduction system, consequently increasing the risk of LBBB.
Objective To measure VBR-STJ angle and explore its impact on the development of LBBB post TAVR.
Methods Patients undergoing TAVR using the Sapiens 3 valve between 2016 and 2021, without pre-TAVR conduction anomalies were included. The angle between the VBR and the ascending aorta was measured as the angle between the VBR plane and the plane of the STJ on cardiac CT, along with the annulus dimensions. TAVR implantation depth was measured on intra-procedural fluoroscopy images.
Results 1204 patients were included, with 145 having new-onset LBBB. The VBR-STJ angle was significantly greater in the new-onset LBBB group (7.3 ± 4.7 vs 5.9 ± 4.6, p=0.002), and the difference in implantation depth between the levels of right and none coronary cusp (RCC and NCC) was significantly correlated with the VBR-STJ angle (r=0.1, p=0.03). This angle was further associated with new-onset LBBB after adjustment to patient and procedural characteristics (OR 1.08 CI: [1.04, 1.13], p<0.001).
Conclusion Patients developing LBBB have larger VBR-STJ angle which was associated with greater depth of implantation of the TAVR valve below the RCC compared to the NCC. Precise understanding of the aortic root anatomy can help to predict onset of LBBB which in turn can inform decision making regarding optimal way of treating aortic stenosis and may improve procedure planning.
Condensed abstract This study explores the impact of the virtual basal ring (VBR) to the sino-tubular junction (STJ) angle on the development of new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) post TAVR. The angle was measured in 1204 patients who underwent TAVR, with 145 developing LBBB post TAVR. The measured angle was significantly higher in patient with new-onset LBBB and was independently correlated with new-onset LBBB. These findings emphasize the importance of understanding the aortic root anatomy to improve TAVR planning and reduce the incidence of LBBB.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
This is a retrospective study
Funding Statement
No external fundings was received
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Cleveland Clinic institutional review board approved this study
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Disclosures: None
Data Availability
Data referred to in the manuscript is not available for sharing per the institutional policies
